MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4206052913 · doi:10.3138/9781442620360_11

Documents XXV

2013· book-chapter· en· W4206052913 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Press eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Governance and Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrime ministerHistoryPrime (order theory)Political scienceOperations researchLaw and economicsLawEngineeringSociologyMathematicsCombinatoricsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

XXV. Adversaries and Allies, and Those in Between, December 1939 - January 1941 103. Japanese Attitude, 1 December 1939 104. Subversive Activities, 13 December 1939 105. Memorandum for the Prime Minister (Un-American Activites), 15 January 1940 106. To Mackenzie King, 27 March 1940 107. The Present Outlook, 30 April 1940 108. Draft Telegram to Winston Churchill (At the Side of Britain and France), 29 May 1940 109. To Isabel and Her Mother, 30-31 May and 6 June 1940 110. Notes on the Far Eastern Situation, 9 July [1940] 111. League of Nations, 3 August 1940 112. Notes to the Prime Minister (Ogdensburg Agreement), 19 August 1940 113. Note to the Prime Minister, with Draft Telegram to Winston Churchill (North American Defence), 28 August 1940 114. Memorandum for the Prime Minister (Canadian Japanese), 30 September 1940 115. Memorandum for the Prime Minister (Allied Governments Meeting), 2 November 1940 116. To Mackenzie King, 17 December 1940 117. Memorandum for the Prime Minister (Frank Underhill), 7 January 1941 118. Cabinet War Committee, 28 January 1941

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4730.310

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Press eBooks→Same topicCorporate Governance and Law→French-language works237,207→