MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206056447 · doi:10.25145/j.cedille.2021.20.09

Aproximaciones a las poetas francesas de la Belle Époque en España: traducciones actuales de la obra de Anna de Noailles

2021· article· en· W4206056447 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueÇédille · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European Literature and History
Canadian institutionsCarré Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryArtHonorHumanitiesLiteratureComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, there has been a renewed interest for French female poets as it has been proved by the translations workflow in Spain. The aim of this study is to define the Belle Époque translations as well as the main channels of reception emphasizing on Anna de Noailles’ translations. Some of the work of this wellknown poet was translated by famous Spanish authors such as Fortún, Marquina or Maristany. Nowadays, two poetry books have been published: Las pasiones y las tumbas, translated by Mireia Alonso Ribeiro (2011 [2020]), and El honor de sufrir, by Julio Pollino Tamayo (2018). By means of a diachronic study of Noailles’ translations, we will analyse the reception of her poetry throughout a study of some of her poems from a translation studies point of view

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it