MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206057491 · doi:10.3390/en15030752

Feasibility of Solar Grid-Based Industrial Virtual Power Plant for Optimal Energy Scheduling: A Case of Indian Power Sector

2022· article· en· W4206057491 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVirtual power plantRenewable energyDistributed generationGridPeaking power plantScheduling (production processes)EngineeringReliability engineeringAutomotive engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increased popularity of small-scale DER has replaced the well-established concept of conventional generating plants around the world. In the present energy scenario, a significant share of energy production now comes from the grid integrated DERs installed at various consumer premises. These DERs are being renewable-based generates only intermittent power, which in turn makes the scheduling of electrical dispatch a tough task. The Virtual Power Plant (VPP) is a potential solution to this challenge, which coordinates and aggregates the DERs generation into a single controllable profile. In this paper, a modified PSO-based multi-objective optimization is proposed for the VPP scheduling in distribution network applications such as energy cost minimization, peak shaving, and reliability improvement. For feasibility analysis of the VPP, a case study of state power utility is taken, which includes a 90 bus industrial feeder with grid integrated PVs as DER. The optimized results are computed in both grid-connected and autonomous mode reveal that the operating cost, peak demand, and EENS are declined by 31.70%, 23.59%, and 62.30% respectively. The overall results obtained are compared by the results obtained from other well-established optimization techniques and it is found that the proposed technique is comparatively more cost-effective than others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it