MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206057491 · doi:10.3390/en15030752

Feasibility of Solar Grid-Based Industrial Virtual Power Plant for Optimal Energy Scheduling: A Case of Indian Power Sector

2022· article· en· W4206057491 on OpenAlexafffund
Harpreet Sharma, Sachin Mishra, Javed Dhillon, Naveen Kumar Sharma, Mohit Bajaj, Rizwan Tariq, Ateeq Ur Rehman, Muhammad Shafiq, Habib Hamam

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVirtual power plantRenewable energyDistributed generationGridPeaking power plantScheduling (production processes)EngineeringReliability engineeringAutomotive engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increased popularity of small-scale DER has replaced the well-established concept of conventional generating plants around the world. In the present energy scenario, a significant share of energy production now comes from the grid integrated DERs installed at various consumer premises. These DERs are being renewable-based generates only intermittent power, which in turn makes the scheduling of electrical dispatch a tough task. The Virtual Power Plant (VPP) is a potential solution to this challenge, which coordinates and aggregates the DERs generation into a single controllable profile. In this paper, a modified PSO-based multi-objective optimization is proposed for the VPP scheduling in distribution network applications such as energy cost minimization, peak shaving, and reliability improvement. For feasibility analysis of the VPP, a case study of state power utility is taken, which includes a 90 bus industrial feeder with grid integrated PVs as DER. The optimized results are computed in both grid-connected and autonomous mode reveal that the operating cost, peak demand, and EENS are declined by 31.70%, 23.59%, and 62.30% respectively. The overall results obtained are compared by the results obtained from other well-established optimization techniques and it is found that the proposed technique is comparatively more cost-effective than others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergiesSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207