MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206090210 · doi:10.1109/twc.2022.3142172

Age-Oriented Transmission Protocol Design in Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks

2022· article· en· W4206090210 on OpenAlexaff
Dongqing Li, Shaohua Wu, Jian Jiao, Ning Zhang, Qinyu Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersScience and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong ProvinceNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRetransmissionHybrid automatic repeat requestComputer scienceAlgorithmAutomatic repeat requestNotationMathematical notationRedundancy (engineering)Theoretical computer scienceMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsTransmission (telecommunications)ArithmeticTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the age-oriented hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) protocol design in space-air-ground integrated networks (SAGINs) scenarios. A real-time communication system, where the updates are delivered from the remote nodes to terrestrial devices, is formulated. As the end-to-end latency$D$is nontrivial, the traditional HARQ with frequent feedbacks is not always beneficial to timely transmission. Intuitively, there is a threshold$D^{*}$of$D$, only within which retransmission is advantageous to age. Inspired by this, we formulate an age-optimal redundancy allocation problem and derive the explicit expression of$D^{*}$for advantageous retransmissions. Besides, to further increase the timeliness of the system, we propose a fast incremental redundancy hybrid ARQ protocol (fast IR-HARQ), where successive decoding and feedback operations are omitted based on channel estimation. Considering the shadowed Rician fading channel and finite blocklength regime, we derive expressions of the average age for the standard IR-HARQ and fast IR-HARQ setups. As expected, the proposed fast IR-HARQ scheme reduces the average age significantly compared with the IR-HARQ strategy. Further, we evaluate the influence of different parameters on the age performance of the fast IR-HARQ scheme. The results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed fast IR-HARQ protocol without loss of reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207