MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A construção social das ciencias sociais na periferia

2000· dissertation· pt· W4206106167 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Adriana Barreiro Diaz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSociology and Education in Brazil
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research CentreMassachusetts Institute of Technology
KeywordsInstitutionalisationAgency (philosophy)SociologyPolitical scienceRestructuringSocial scienceSocial researchPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a study about the emergence and institutionalization of two social sciences disciplines and lays on the social constructivist theoretical framework The latter assumes that scientific disciplines develop in specific social environments, under the influence of particular economic, institutional, intellectual and social factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0930.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSociology and Education in BrazilFrench-language works237,207