MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Towards Automated Variability-Aware Machine-Learning-Based Modeling Analysis

2021· article· en· W4206124320 on OpenAlex
Cristina Tavares, Nathalia Nascimento, Paulo Alencar, Donald Cowan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAutomationVariety (cybernetics)Data scienceProcess (computing)Software engineeringFeature (linguistics)Data modelingMachine learningData miningArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data analysis involves the use of a wide variety of systems and libraries to support the exploration and development of models that can uncover valuable patterns and enable individuals and businesses to draw informed insights. However, efforts towards the automation of the ML-based data analysis modeling process faces numerous challenges. In this paper, we describe our ongoing work towards the automation of the data analysis modeling phase based on a variability-aware approach. This approach involves capturing the variabilities through feature models, designing an automated framework to support the analysis, and developing use cases. The work advances the state of the art in the development of methods and tools to support the automation of ML-based data analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0110.006
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.546
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.100 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it