Bibliographic record
Abstract
MayhemandMurder:Narrative andMoralProblems in theDetective Story. By HETA PYRHONEN.Toronto, Buffalo, NY, and London: University of Toronto Press. I999. viii + 338 pp. $60;?45 (paperbound$24.95;?I6). This volume is a thoroughlyresearchedand carefullyarguedengagement with the genre of detective fiction. Heta Pyrhonen concentrates on the ways in which detective fiction stages a seriesof complex argumentsabout the process of reading, and on how thisnarratologicalaspectof the genre may map on to broaderquestions of guiltandresponsibility:'In thisbook, I takeasmy startingpoint the "fundamental formal rule" of detective fiction, that is, the structuringforce of the two (insteadof one) generic questions"Whodunit?"and "Whois guilty?"The questionthatI study is this: How do these two generic questions organize and pattern the detective narrative?'(p. 4). The concept of 'patterning'is indeed important to the book as a whole, not simply for the ways in which it illuminates the spatial geographies of differenttexts, but at a more significantmethodological level. The impulse behind the early chapters of this book is shaped by the formal strategies of structuralist criticism, and Pyrhonen provides extensive and detailed analytic accounts of the key oppositionalstructuresof her chosen texts. Pyrhonen ranges very widely across the canon of detective fiction in this study. Chapters are organized in terms of methodological questions, which are then explored through readings of classic and contemporarytexts. These include works by Poe, Chesterton, Conan Doyle, Chandler, Christie, and Spillane, but also by PatriciaCornwell,Michael Dibdin, Elizabeth George, and LaurieKing. This leads to some productivejuxtapositions, but does also at times amount to takingthe very coherence of the genre somewhat for granted. It might perhaps have been interestingto see more attention given to the difficultiesof reading texts from such differenthistoricalperiodsand culturaltraditionstogether. The second half of the book deals more particularlywith questions of guilt and responsibility,and alsowith the 'moralambiguity'generatedby the recognitionthat 'our choice of detective narratives as reading material thus signals our desire to spend time immersedin crime and its investigation'(p. 56). Pyrhonendevelops an interestingargument here about the 'ethos' of differentcharacterswithin detective fiction, which is understood as the ways in which both the detective and the reader evaluate the moral significance of their actions, and she constructs a fruitful opposition between irony and cynicism that draws intriguingly on Zizek's The Indivisible Remainder (London:Verso, I996). The book concludes with two chapters of detailed argument about the moral complexities of Christie and Chandler that certainly demonstrate the rigour and the care with which this study is executed. MayhemandMurder is ambitious in its scope and meticulous in its argument, and constitutesa detailed scholarlyengagement with the genre of detective fiction, and in particularwith the narratologicalissuesit stagesso effectively.There is certainly a significantrange of murders in this volume, but my final slight disappointment was that there is relativelylittle mayhem:the methodological and thematic choices made by the authormade this,finally,a ratherorderlybook. QUEENMARY,UNIVERSITY OFLONDON MORAGSHIACH RobertBrowning'sLanguage.By DONALDS. HAIR. Toronto, Buffalo, NY, and London: Universityof Toronto Press. I999. ix + 326 pp. $55; f40. The reaction against the abstract, and absolutely conceived, categories of theory that has set in over the last few years has had the beneficial effect of concentrating MayhemandMurder:Narrative andMoralProblems in theDetective Story. By HETA PYRHONEN.Toronto, Buffalo, NY, and London: University of Toronto Press. I999. viii + 338 pp. $60;?45 (paperbound$24.95;?I6). This volume is a thoroughlyresearchedand carefullyarguedengagement with the genre of detective fiction. Heta Pyrhonen concentrates on the ways in which detective fiction stages a seriesof complex argumentsabout the process of reading, and on how thisnarratologicalaspectof the genre may map on to broaderquestions of guiltandresponsibility:'In thisbook, I takeasmy startingpoint the "fundamental formal rule" of detective fiction, that is, the structuringforce of the two (insteadof one) generic questions"Whodunit?"and "Whois guilty?"The questionthatI study is this: How do these two generic questions organize and pattern the detective narrative?'(p. 4). The concept of 'patterning'is indeed important to the book as a whole, not simply for the ways in which it illuminates the spatial geographies of differenttexts, but at a more significantmethodological level. The impulse behind the early chapters of this book is shaped by the formal strategies of structuralist criticism, and Pyrhonen provides extensive and detailed analytic accounts of the key oppositionalstructuresof her chosen...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".