MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206173210 · doi:10.1121/2.0001511

Inverse acoustical characterization of porous material: A novel approach using diffuse sound field and transmission loss

2019· article· en· W4206173210 on OpenAlexaff
Thiago Cavalheiro, Ricardo Scremin Rizzatti, Fabio Luis Val Quintans Kulakauskas, Lucas Val Quintans Kulakauskas, Luisa Piccolo Serafim, Arcanjo Lenzi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of meetings on acoustics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcousticsTransmission lossReverberationSound transmission classRoom acousticsRepeatabilityMaterials scienceElectromagnetic reverberation chamberAcoustic impedanceArchitectural acousticsElectrical impedanceSoundproofingComputer scienceMathematicsEngineeringPhysicsUltrasonic sensorElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Passive noise control employing porous material is widely used in aircraft cabins. Inverse acoustical characterization has become popular to retrieve porous material macroscopic parameters due to its straightforwardness in terms of experimental practicality, costs, and time involved. Most of those methods have as input data some impedance tube measurement. However, this approach has well-known drawbacks, mainly concerning the sample boundary conditions. In this study, the sound transmission loss measured in reverberation rooms is adopted as input data to obtain the macroscopic parameters by inverse characterization. Two-meter-squared samples were measured. Three low-density porous materials, typically applied in the aerospace industry, were analyzed. Transfer Matrix Method is combined with Johnson-Champoux-Allard equivalent fluid model on an optimization process using Differential Evolution algorithm. The cost function uses the mean square error between model prediction and measured values. The frequency range is selected to minimize the uncertainties from the diffuse sound field. Satisfactory repeatability on the optimized parameters was achieved. The macroscopic parameters obtained from the transmission loss measurements as input seem to be more robust than those obtained from the impedance tube measurements. The results suggest that the boundary conditions have less influence on measured data in reverberation rooms setup than in impedance tube.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of meetings on acousticsSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207