MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206193457 · doi:10.36341/racic.v6i2.2130

PERANCANGAN STRUKTUR ATAS JEMBATAN SUNGAI MESIM MENGGUNAKAN RANGKA BAJA BERDASARKAN SNI 1725:2016

2021· article· id· W4206193457 on OpenAlexaff
Layla Kumala Rizki, Indriyani Puluhulawa

Bibliographic record

VenueRacic Rab Construction Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and construction materials studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesStructural engineeringEngineeringArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Salah satu sungai yang terdapat di Pulau Rupat adalah Sungai Mesim. Jembatan yang melintasi sungai tersebut merupakan jembatan beton bertulang.. Sesuai dengan peraturan Bina Marga untuk rintangan sepanjang 40 - 200 m maka jenis jembatan rangka baja merupakan jenis yang ekonomis. Oleh karena itu didalam penelitian ini penulis melakukan peranaan ulang struktur atas Jembatan Sungai Mesim menggunakan rangka baja. Perencanaan ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan dimensi struktur atas yang efektif, tahap pelaksanaan dan Rencana Anggaran Biaya. Perencanaan ini mengacu kepada SNI 1725:2016 tentang pembebanan jembatan, RSNI T-03-2005 tentang perencanaan struktur baja untuk jembatan, dan SNI T-12-2004 tentang perencanaan struktur beton. Jembatan ini direncanakan dengan panjang 52 m. Berdasarkan hasil perencanaan diperoleh tebal slab jembatan 200 mm, gelagar memanjang menggunakan IWF 350.175.7.11, gelagar melintang menggunakan IWF 700.300.13.24, rangka utama menggunakan IWF 400.400.13.21 dan ikatan angin menggunakan IWF 150.150.7.10.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRacic Rab Construction ResearchSame topicGeotechnical and construction materials studiesFrench-language works237,207