Faculty Opinions recommendation of Etiology, presenting features and outcome of children with non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis: A multicentre national study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a main cause of portal hypertension in children. We describe the characteristics at presentation and outcome of a cohort of patients with PVT to determine clinical features and predictors of outcome.METHODS: We recorded: (1) Associated factors: prematurity, congenital malformations, neonatal illnesses, umbilical vein catheterization (UVC), deep infections, surgery; (2) congenital and acquired prothrombotic disorders; (3) features at last follow up including survival rate and need for surgery.RESULTS: 187 patients, mean age at diagnosis 4 ± 3.7 years, had a history of prematurity (61%); UVC (65%); neonatal illnesses (79%). The diagnosis followed the detection of splenomegaly (40%), gastrointestinal bleeding (36%), hypersplenism (6%), or was incidental (18%). Of 71 patients who had endoscopy at presentation 62 (87%) had oesophageal varices. After 11.3 years' follow up 63 (34%) required surgery or TIPS. Ten-year survival rate was 98%, with 90% shunt patency. Spleen size, variceal bleeding and hypersplenism at presentation were predictors of surgery or TIPS (p < 0.05).CONCLUSION: PVT is associated with congenital and acquired co-morbidities. History of prematurity, neonatal illnesses and UVC should lead to rule out PVT. Large spleen, variceal bleeding and hypersplenism at presentation predict the need for eventual surgery in a third of cases.Copyright © 2019 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. PMID: 30928422
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.157 | 0.043 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".