Mystère et crime dans le récit policier émergent : l’exemple de « The Avenger » de Thomas De Quincey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se penche sur la manière dont De Quincey appréhende la question de l’élucidation criminelle. Associé à une approche esthétisante du crime, il envisage en effet sous cet angle la question du « mystère », vu comme susceptible de produire un effet propre dans On Murder Considered as One of the Fine Arts. Avec « The Avenger », il propose d’ailleurs déjà en 1838, avant donc que Poe ne crée le personnage de Dupin, une fiction criminelle invitant le lecteur à se mettre en quête du sens évanescent. Ici se lit un pacte de lecture anticipant à certains égards celui du genre policier, mais qui se fonde sur un radical vertige herméneutique, où le trouble dans la signification est aussi travail de références religieuses pour donner consistance au traitement narratif. Le mystère, entre visée narratologique et convocation discrète de résonances théologiques, se constitue en interface littéraire pour confronter le lecteur au sens insaisissable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".