MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206204840 · doi:10.1093/eurjcn/zvac001

A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of patient education for secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease: impact on psychological outcomes

2022· review· en· W4206204840 on OpenAlexaff
Wendan Shi, Gabriela L. M. Ghisi, Ling Zhang, Karice Hyun, Maureen Pakosh, Robyn Gallagher

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity Health Network
FundersCaring for our Country
KeywordsMedicineAnxietyMeta-analysisRandomized controlled trialPhysical therapyPsychosocialCINAHLMyocardial infarctionPsycINFOMEDLINEPsychological interventionDepression (economics)Internal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Patient education is a cardiac rehabilitation core component and is associated with improvements in self-management of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). However, the efficacy of such interventions on psychosocial outcomes and relative impact of duration is less clear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of patient education for secondary prevention related to behaviour change and risk factor modification on psychological outcomes in CHD patients. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, EmCare, MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to February 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating patient education in CHD patients, or following myocardial infarction, or revascularization compared with usual care were identified. Outcomes included depression and anxiety at <6 and 6-12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 39 RCTs and 8748 participants were included. Patient education significantly improved participants' depressive symptoms at <6 (SMD -0.82) and 6-12 months (SMD -0.38) of follow-up and anxiety level at <6 (SMD -0.90), and 6-12 months (SMD -0.32) of follow-up. Patient education also reduced the risk for having clinical depression by 35% and anxiety by 60%. Longer patient education of ≥3 months, resulted in more improvement in depressive symptoms at 6-12 months (coefficient -0.210) compared to shorter duration. CONCLUSIONS: Patient education for secondary prevention reduces anxiety and depressive symptoms in CHD patients. Regardless of intensity, longer patient education improves depression more than short duration. More information is needed on the relative impact of other intervention components. DATA REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020200504).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0250.050
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular NursingSame topicCardiac Health and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207