MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206215539 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-02563877mtgabs

Shape Effect of Zinc Nanostructures on Electrochemical CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction

2020· article· en· W4206215539 on OpenAlexaff
Jing Xiao, Min‐Rui Gao, Jing‐Li Luo

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaraday efficiencyElectrocatalystElectrochemistryCatalysisNanostructureMaterials scienceChemical engineeringZincNanoparticleHexagonal crystal systemNanotechnologyInorganic chemistryElectrodeChemistryMetallurgyCrystallographyPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To mitigate CO2 emissions and enable the conversion of CO2 to carbon-neutral fuels, the research on electrochemical reduction of CO2 (CO2RR) is gaining momentum. As an earth-abundant material, Zn is a promising electrocatalyst for highly active and selective reduction for the reduction of CO2 to CO. However, the shape effect of the Zn-based electrocatalysts on CO2RR has not been well understood. Herein, we synthesized hexagonal Zn nanoplates and systematically explored its shape-dependent catalytic activity for CO2RR, so as to achieve a better understanding of the relationship between the morphology and the catalytic activity of non-noble metal catalysts. Compared with the similarly-sized Zn nanoparticles, the H-Zn-NPs exhibit remarkably enhanced current density, together with an improved CO Faradaic efficiency of over 85% in a wide potential window. Theoretical results reveal that the unique hexagonal Zn nanostructure offers an increased number of catalytically active sites which are active for CO2RR to CO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207