MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206221854 · doi:10.18778/8220-617-3.13

Bitwa o Mszczonów we wrześniu 1939 roku

2021· book-chapter· en· W4206221854 on OpenAlexaff
Witold Jarno

Bibliographic record

VenueWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego eBooks · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolish Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVictoryBattleInfantryGloryGermanHistoryRifleEngineeringAncient historyPolitical scienceLawArchaeologyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article describes the capture of Mszczonów by soldiers of the 31st Kaniowski Rifle Regiment on 11 September 1939. At that time, the regiment fought in isolation from its own 10th Infantry Division and retreated independently towards the Vistula. The battle fought by the regiment was one of the greatest successes of its soldiers during the September campaign of 1939, although for many years it remained in the shadow of the parallel battle on the Bzura River. Only in recent years the memory of this somewhat forgotten victory has begun to be restored. The capture of Mszczonów by the units of the 31st Kaniowski Rifle Regiment brought glory to the regiment. His actions led, albeit for a short time, to panic in the command of the German XVI Army Corps, which was not aware of the forces that took part in the fight. The soldiers of Lieutenant Colonel Wincenty Wnuk achieved a tactical success which – although it did not bring any operational benefits – nevertheless raised the declining morale. It should be emphasized that for this victory the regiment was awarded the Virtuti Militari V class in 1966.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego eBooksSame topicPolish Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207