MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206224458 · doi:10.1353/yes.2004.0049

Romances of the Archive in Contemporary British Fiction by Suzanne Keen (review)

2004· article· en· W4206224458 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Yearbook of English Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFreedom of Expression and Defamation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncyclopediaHistoryPlot (graphics)CriticismPleasureLiteratureArt historyArtPhilosophyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

with another,that of xenophobic greyness,this book is well researchedand presents the reader with an insight into the colonizer colonized. UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING ANGELA SMITH Romancesof the Archivein Contemporary British Fiction. By SUZANNE KEEN. Toronto, Buffalo,NY, and London:Universityof Toronto Press.200I. x + 288 pp. $60; ?40. ISBN: 0-8020-3589-2. Suzanne Keen sets out her stall in an excellent introduction in which she says, among many other things, 'I make every effort to write about fiction in terms that a novel-readercan understandwithout resortingto an encyclopedia of literary terms' (p. 6) and 'this book comes out of decades of pleasure reading' (p. 9), both of which I found refreshingand reassuring;as I went on, I was not to be disappointed - she writesin an approachablestyle,with a minimum ofjargon and very few errors, except for the consistent mis-spellingof 'siege'. From time to time she comes up with marvellousmetaphors, such as the researcher'discoveringoccluded truths and clarifyingviews of clouded pasts' (p. 181).As I read the introduction I recognized many of the books cited, and had read many of them, but had never thought of lumping them together as 'a pervasive form of contemporary British fiction, widely dispersedamong a whole range of sub-genresof the novel' (p. 230). This perception makes for a fascinatingthesis, and a good read. Her method is conventional but effective, devoting chaptersto each of the identified sub-genres and dealing in each with several case studies, never more than four, but enriching plot synopses with her analysis, criticism, and comment, and citing numerous other novels and studies which have touched on her subject about a fifth of the book is given over to the notes, bibliography,and index. Probably the least effective chapter is that dealing with 'Wellsprings',that obligatory look back to influences from Spenser, through Gothic to HenryJames and H. P. Lovecraft,and perhaps not enough about TheJame of theRose.But in the previous chapter she deals in detail with A. S. Byatt's Possession, which is clearly the star of the genre. 'Much of Possession's energy comes from the recovery and celebrationof old-fashionedscholarlypracticesin a day of high-falutin'theory'(p. 57).The author deals with prevailing theory throughout the book in a thoughtfulway, but cannot resist judgements such as 'detective fictions offer a compelling alternative to postmodernism'sdoubts about stabletruthsand retrievableevidence' (p. I55).As an archivistI know that no archive is complete, and that the whole truth is therefore unknowable, but that should not deter us, or fictional characters, from seeking versions of the truth. Chapter 4 gives us a lively (in more ways than one since she brings in Penelope Lively)discussionof the contestbetween Historyand Heritage,concentratingon the works of BarryUnsworth and Peter Ackroyd, and debunkingthe Whig interpretation of history as she goes along. In discussingAckroyd's Chatterton she comes up with one of my favouritesentences in the book: 'Plagiarism,theft and forgery [...] may be technically criminal, but they are also at the heart of creativity, going by the names of allusion, echo and inspiration'(pp. I24-25), which brings to mind the novels ofJoyce and Beckett. The following chapter is the strangest,where the romance of the archive conjuresup supernaturalforces and conspiratorialpowers, particularlyin Lempriere's Dictionary by LawrenceNorfolk,which comes in for a good with another,that of xenophobic greyness,this book is well researchedand presents the reader with an insight into the colonizer colonized. UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING ANGELA SMITH Romancesof the Archivein Contemporary British Fiction. By SUZANNE KEEN. Toronto, Buffalo,NY, and London:Universityof Toronto Press.200I. x + 288 pp. $60; ?40. ISBN: 0-8020-3589-2. Suzanne Keen sets out her stall in an excellent introduction in which she says, among many other things, 'I make every effort to write about fiction in terms that a novel-readercan understandwithout resortingto an encyclopedia of literary terms' (p. 6) and 'this book comes out of decades of pleasure reading' (p. 9), both of which I found refreshingand reassuring;as I went on, I was not to be disappointed - she writesin an approachablestyle,with a minimum ofjargon and very few errors, except for the consistent mis-spellingof 'siege'. From time to time she comes up with marvellousmetaphors...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it