Romances of the Archive in Contemporary British Fiction by Suzanne Keen (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
with another,that of xenophobic greyness,this book is well researchedand presents the reader with an insight into the colonizer colonized. UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING ANGELA SMITH Romancesof the Archivein Contemporary British Fiction. By SUZANNE KEEN. Toronto, Buffalo,NY, and London:Universityof Toronto Press.200I. x + 288 pp. $60; ?40. ISBN: 0-8020-3589-2. Suzanne Keen sets out her stall in an excellent introduction in which she says, among many other things, 'I make every effort to write about fiction in terms that a novel-readercan understandwithout resortingto an encyclopedia of literary terms' (p. 6) and 'this book comes out of decades of pleasure reading' (p. 9), both of which I found refreshingand reassuring;as I went on, I was not to be disappointed - she writesin an approachablestyle,with a minimum ofjargon and very few errors, except for the consistent mis-spellingof 'siege'. From time to time she comes up with marvellousmetaphors, such as the researcher'discoveringoccluded truths and clarifyingviews of clouded pasts' (p. 181).As I read the introduction I recognized many of the books cited, and had read many of them, but had never thought of lumping them together as 'a pervasive form of contemporary British fiction, widely dispersedamong a whole range of sub-genresof the novel' (p. 230). This perception makes for a fascinatingthesis, and a good read. Her method is conventional but effective, devoting chaptersto each of the identified sub-genres and dealing in each with several case studies, never more than four, but enriching plot synopses with her analysis, criticism, and comment, and citing numerous other novels and studies which have touched on her subject about a fifth of the book is given over to the notes, bibliography,and index. Probably the least effective chapter is that dealing with 'Wellsprings',that obligatory look back to influences from Spenser, through Gothic to HenryJames and H. P. Lovecraft,and perhaps not enough about TheJame of theRose.But in the previous chapter she deals in detail with A. S. Byatt's Possession, which is clearly the star of the genre. 'Much of Possession's energy comes from the recovery and celebrationof old-fashionedscholarlypracticesin a day of high-falutin'theory'(p. 57).The author deals with prevailing theory throughout the book in a thoughtfulway, but cannot resist judgements such as 'detective fictions offer a compelling alternative to postmodernism'sdoubts about stabletruthsand retrievableevidence' (p. I55).As an archivistI know that no archive is complete, and that the whole truth is therefore unknowable, but that should not deter us, or fictional characters, from seeking versions of the truth. Chapter 4 gives us a lively (in more ways than one since she brings in Penelope Lively)discussionof the contestbetween Historyand Heritage,concentratingon the works of BarryUnsworth and Peter Ackroyd, and debunkingthe Whig interpretation of history as she goes along. In discussingAckroyd's Chatterton she comes up with one of my favouritesentences in the book: 'Plagiarism,theft and forgery [...] may be technically criminal, but they are also at the heart of creativity, going by the names of allusion, echo and inspiration'(pp. I24-25), which brings to mind the novels ofJoyce and Beckett. The following chapter is the strangest,where the romance of the archive conjuresup supernaturalforces and conspiratorialpowers, particularlyin Lempriere's Dictionary by LawrenceNorfolk,which comes in for a good with another,that of xenophobic greyness,this book is well researchedand presents the reader with an insight into the colonizer colonized. UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING ANGELA SMITH Romancesof the Archivein Contemporary British Fiction. By SUZANNE KEEN. Toronto, Buffalo,NY, and London:Universityof Toronto Press.200I. x + 288 pp. $60; ?40. ISBN: 0-8020-3589-2. Suzanne Keen sets out her stall in an excellent introduction in which she says, among many other things, 'I make every effort to write about fiction in terms that a novel-readercan understandwithout resortingto an encyclopedia of literary terms' (p. 6) and 'this book comes out of decades of pleasure reading' (p. 9), both of which I found refreshingand reassuring;as I went on, I was not to be disappointed - she writesin an approachablestyle,with a minimum ofjargon and very few errors, except for the consistent mis-spellingof 'siege'. From time to time she comes up with marvellousmetaphors...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».