MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Editorial

2009· editorial· es· W4206228815 on OpenAlex
Peter S. Cranston, Lars Vilhelmsen, Frank‐Thorsten Krell

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSystematic Entomology · 2009
Typeeditorial
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHemiptera Insect Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPatienceEditorial boardDiligenceCommitLibrary scienceOperations researchHistorySociologyLawPolitical scienceComputer sciencePsychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With this first issue of volume 34 of Systematic Entomology, we welcome a new co-editor, Lars Vilhelmsen from the Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, and thank and acknowledge the service given to the journal by Frank Krell over the past 6 years. Ironically, the reduction in Frank’s daily commute from 4 h a day in the U.K. to a short drive in Denver has reduced his time to commit to editing. We thank him for his diligence and maintenance of friendly relationships with the world’s Coleopteran systematists. From January 2009, Lars Vilhelmsen will handle Hymenoptera and European and Asian origin manuscripts. Peter Cranston will continue to deal with Diptera and submissions from the ‘rest of the world’. As editors of a peer-reviewed journal, we understand the ever-increasing demands on reviewers’ time and patience. To this end we have sought to implement a ‘pre-reviewing’ system to ensure that specialist reviewers’ valuable time is spent only in submissions that are deemed to lie within the remit of the journal, and are of appropriate quality and sufficiently wide interest. Our editorial board is best used for this pre-review purpose and increasingly editors call upon their opinion in this regard. With a change in co-editor, it is timely to review the composition of the board. After deliberation between all editors, and consultation with existing board members, we are pleased to announce that Michael Engel, University of Kansas; John Trueman, Australian National University; Carol von Dohlen, Utah State University; and Niklas Wahlberg, University of Turku, have agreed to add their expertise. To those who have served in the past, we express our grateful thanks for the services provided and hope that we will continue to receive their manuscripts and those of their students and laboratories. To the new board (identified on the inside front cover), we look forward to your judgements on what constitutes good entomological systematics, suitable for our journal, irrespective of how close to your particular research taxon and methods. In 2008, the trend continued towards increased pre-review advice from members of the board, a high acceptance rate amongst those forwarded to referees, shorter papers, and greater allocation of data to supplementary materials (now supporting information). The time to paper publication was also short – indeed rather too close to just-in-time inventory practice! This meant reduced use of e-availability and near equilibrium between pages allocated to the journal and the number of accepted papers. In the four issues (721 pages) in the year, we published 35 papers, of average length 20 pages, with a maximum of 44 pages. The location of first authors continues to show dominance of the U.S.A., although again we note that many U.S.-based authors are doctoral and post-doctoral researchers from elsewhere, who receive their graduate and post-doctoral systematics training in the U.S.A. and some of whom return to permanent positions at home, or to new countries. Our first authors were located in the U.S.A. (12), France (four), Australia (two), Argentina (two), Canada (two), Spain (two), Sweden (two) and Japan (two) and one from each of Austria, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea and Singapore. Co-authors’ nationalities included many of the above, plus the Czech Republic, Mexico, Switzerland and, with regret, only a solitary British-based co-author. We published six book and software reviews, an editorial, and a solicited opinion piece that aroused some heated correspondence, but no formal responses were forthcoming. Nevertheless, we encourage further submission of opinions of contentious issues in insect systematics. The journal produced two ‘virtual’ issues associated with topics of symposia from the annual meeting of the Entomological Society of America held at Reno, Nevada, in November 2008. The idea is to bring together thematic papers published in the journal in past years, linked with an editorial, or in future by a commissioned ‘Opinion’ article. The first collection concerning ‘Larval Information in Entomological Systematics’ was associated with a symposium organised by Caroline Chaboo and Yves Alarie, and the second, on ‘Systematic and Diversity of Coleoptera’, with one organised by Fran Keller. Free access is provided to all included papers from a single site: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/pdf/sen_larvae_vi.pdf and http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/pdf/sen_coleoptera_vi.pdf respectively. We believe that this initiative will encourage student access to a range of papers of significance in our discipline, and we encourage others to suggest future thematic topics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it