Cratonic Earthquakes in the Crust-Mantle Transition, Western Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep earthquakes in the lower continental lithosphere - the lower crust and uppermost mantle - are frequently too poorly located in depth to be definitively labelled as having occurred above or below the Mohorovičić discontinuity (Moho; base of the crust). Our Sn/Lg methodology utilizes two regional seismic waves to determine the depth of an earthquake relative to the Moho: Sn and Lg waves, which are phases that propagate through reflections in the mantle lid and the crust, respectively. Therefore, an analysis of Sn and Lg waves can provide a robust understanding of an earthquake’s depth relative to the Moho. We present our Sn/Lg analysis through reduced-velocity record sections, which show Sn and Lg energy in the waveform, allowing measurements of RMS amplitudes, and maps of ray-paths and Sn/Lg amplitude ratios which allow us to visualize the propagation of Sn and Lg in all directions. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach by applying it to a well-known upper-mantle earthquake in Wyoming and a shallow earthquake with a similar epicenter. We then use our method to study other deep-crustal/upper-mantle earthquakes in North America. A cluster of earthquakes with reported depths from 10–50 km ± ~10 km, spans the border between Alberta, Canada and Montana, U.S.A. where the crustal thickness increases from ~30 km in the SW to ~45km in the NE. For an earthquake occurring in the crust-mantle transition zone, the dipping Moho should tend to block Sn (decrease the Sn/Lg ratio) in the direction of crustal thickening, and tend to block Lg (increase the Sn/Lg ratio) in the direction of crustal thinning. We studied seven earthquakes of magnitude>2.5. A m=2.7 earthquake, previously reported (USGS PDE) to be at 50±10 km where CRUST 1.0 shows a 49 km Moho depth, and a m=3.5 reported at 38 km depth above a nominal 43 km Moho, both show much stronger Sn/Lg ratios than earthquakes with nearby epicenters at nominal dots of 15 and 21 km. Hence the “50-km” and the “38-km” earthquakes must occur in the upper mantle, or so close to the upper mantle as to preferentially excite Sn. The better-recorded of these earthquakes also shows clear evidence of Sn enhancement along azimuths into regions of thinner crust.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".