MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206249739 · doi:10.1038/s41393-020-0478-7

A pragmatic randomized controlled trial testing the effects of the international scientific SCI exercise guidelines on SCI chronic pain: protocol for the EPIC-SCI trial

2020· article· en· W4206249739 on OpenAlexafffund
Kathleen A. Martin Ginis, Jan W. van der Scheer, Kendra R. Todd, Jennifer C. Davis, Sonja Gaudet, Femke Hoekstra, Mohammad Ehsanul Karim, John L. K. Kramer, Jonathan P. Little, Joel Singer, Andrea Townson, Christopher R. West

Bibliographic record

VenueSpinal Cord · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeCentre for Advancing Health OutcomesSpinal Cord Injury BCBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British ColumbiaInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusProvidence Health CareKelowna General HospitalInterior Health
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of Canada
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialPhysical therapyChronic painIntervention (counseling)GuidelineClinical trialProtocol (science)Physical medicine and rehabilitationAlternative medicineNursingSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.097
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.097
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSpinal CordSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207