MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206257285 · doi:10.5194/epsc2021-501

Mars dust microphysical properties retrieval through TGO/NOMAD UVIS and LNO channels combined nadir datasets analysis

2021· preprint· en· W4206257285 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fabrizio Oliva, E. D’Aversa, G. Bellucci, F. G. Carrozzo, Özgür Karatekin, Luca Ruiz Lozano, Francesca Altieri, Frank Daerden, Ian Thomas, Bojan Ristic, Jon Mason, Yannick Willame, C. Depiesse, Manish Patel, J. J. López‐Moreno, Ann Carine Vandaele, Marilena Amoroso

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMartianDust stormMars Exploration ProgramAtmospheric sciencesAtmosphere of MarsNadirTrace gasEnvironmental sciencePhysicsChemistryAstrobiologyAerosolMeteorologySatelliteAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractIn this work we analyze ExoMars/TGO NOMAD spectrometer [1] nadir data. We exploit both the ultraviolet-visible UVIS channel and the infrared LNO channel to obtain information about Martian dust densities and grains sizes. For the analysis we apply the MITRA radiative transfer tool [2,3,4] to all the spatially and temporally coincident UVIS and LNO 2018 data, also covering a global dust storm. We investigate possible correlations between the results and the local time of the observations.IntroductionStudies focused on Mars 2018 global-scale dust event, as observed by the instruments on board the TGO spacecraft, demonstrate that Martian trace gases abundance and distribution is strongly affected by the presence of dust [5,6,15]. Airborne dust drives Mars’ thermal structure and climate [7] by heating and cooling the lower atmosphere through absorption at VIS-NIR wavelengths [8] and emission in the IR range respectively [9,10,8,11]. These mechanisms affect, for example, the water-ice clouds formation and can drive convection, leading to variations of water vapor abundances [6,16]. In general, the understanding of dust properties is mandatory for the investigation of Martian trace gases vertical distribution.Instrument and ObservationsThe NOMAD spectrometer has three channels covering the ultraviolet/visible (UVIS channel) and the infrared (LNO and SO channels) spectral ranges. While the instrument main focus is the study of trace gases, it can also be exploited to study atmospheric particulate. In this work, we take advantage of the combined UVIS and LNO channels data, acquired in nadir geometry, to study Martian dust microphysical properties. We analyze the whole 2018 dataset taking into account all observations that are spatially and temporally coincident among the two NOMAD channels, in order to build a dataset spanning from the ultraviolet/visible to the infrared spectral range.MethodWe use the MITRA radiative transfer model and inversion algorithm to retrieve dust microphysical properties from the selected dataset. The use of the combined ultraviolet/visible and infrared ranges, covered by UVIS and LNO NOMAD channels together, is required in order to separate the information related to the dust density from that of the grains sizes. However, if no coincident LNO observations are available for a certain UVIS orbit, we still apply the MITRA tool to the UVIS spectral range alone to obtain the dust integrated optical depth. We use only LNO orders covering the wavelength range 2.20-2.65 μm, since they are mostly affected by narrow and isolated gaseous absorption lines and, hence, they can be exploited to study the intensity of the spectral continuum. We take the temperature-pressure profiles from the Mars Climate Database (MCD, [12]) and use the dust optical constants from [13,14]. Surface albedo spectra are derived using an approach based on the SAS method [15] applied to the MEx/OMEGA dataset. The results of the retrieval are investigated for the identification of eventual trends of density and grains sizes with local time or other observing parameters.SummaryThe presented method allows to study Martian dust microphysical properties taking advantage of the combined UVIS and LNO NOMAD channels datasets. Given the reduced spatial coverage of the coincident data, we focus our analysis on the investigation of possible trends in the results with the observations local time. Once validated on 2018 data, the method is planned to be extended to the whole NOMAD dataset.AcknowledgementsExoMars is a space mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) and Roscosmos. The NOMAD experiment is led by the Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (IASB-BIRA), assisted by Co-PI teams from Spain (IAA-CSIC), Italy (INAF-IAPS), and the United Kingdom (Open University). This project acknowledges funding by the Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO), with the financial and contractual coordination by the ESA Prodex Office (PEA 4000103401, 4000121493), by Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MCIU) and by European funds under grants PGC2018-101836-BI00 and ESP2017-87143-R (MINECO/FEDER), as well as by UK Space Agency through grants ST/R005761/1, ST/P001262/1, ST/R001405/1 and ST/R001405/1 and Italian Space Agency through grant 2018-2-HH.0. This work was supported by the Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique – FNRS under grant number 30442502 (ET_HOME). The IAA/CSIC team acknowledges financial support from the State Agency for Research of the Spanish MCIU through the ‘Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa’ award for the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (SEV-2017-0709). US investigators were supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Canadian investigators were supported by the Canadian Space Agency.References:[1]Neefs, E., et al, 2015. Appl. Opt. 54, 28, 8494-8520.[2]Oliva, F., et al, 2016. Icarus 278, 215-237.[3]Sindoni, G., et al, 2013. EPSC2013.[4]Oliva, F., et al, 2018. Icarus 300, 1-11.[5]Daerden, F., et al, 2019. Icarus 326, 197-224.[6]Vandaele, A.C., et al, 2019. Nature 568, 521-525.[7]Kahre, M.A., et al, 2008. Icarus 195, 576-597.[8]Korablev, O. ,et al, 2005. Adv. Space Res. 35, 21–30.[9]Gierasch, P.G., Goody, R.M., 1972. J. Atmos. Sci. 29, 400–402.[10]Pollack, J.,et al, 1979. J. Geophys. Res. 84, 2929–2945.[11]Määttänen, A., et al, 2009. Icarus 201, 504-516.[12]Millour, E., et al, 2018. From Mars to Exomars, 2018.[13]Wolff, M.J., et al, 2009. J. Geophys. Res., 114, E9. [14]Wolff, M.J., et al, 2010. Icarus, 208.[15]Geminale, A., et al, 2015. Icarus 253, 51-65.[16]Aoki, S., et al. 2019. J. Geophys. Res.: Planets,124, 3482-3497.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207