Bandwidth Enhancement of Circular Ring Patch by Loading Single Split Complementary Split Ring Resonator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metamaterials have gained a lot of interest in modern wireless devices due to their electromagnetic characteristics and it is employed to improve antenna parameters such as bandwidth, gain and efficiency. The study presents a novel strategy of single split non-uniform width Complementary Split Ring Resonator (CSRR) equipped Circular ring Microstrip Antenna (CRMA). The radiating element dimensions are seen to be 20 mm x 20 mm at the initial working frequency wherein the CSRR is incorporated on the ground plane of CRMA. The single split non-uniform width metamaterial (CSRR) structure displays -10 dB impedance bandwidth at 11.1 and 13.56 GHz which is beneficial for applications pertaining to X and Ku band. The total bandwidth of the said metamaterial antenna is 4 GHz (10.73-14.75). Optimization is undertaken with the help of commercially assessable simulation software tool Ansys HFSS 2019 version and practically measured using network analyzer. It is quite obvious from the experimentation that the results calculated get along well with the assumed outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".