Herpesviruses and Inflammasomes: One Sensor Does Not Fit All
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Herpesviruses are ubiquitous double-stranded DNA viruses that cause lifelong infections and are associated with a variety of diseases. While they have evolved multiple mechanisms to evade the immune system, they are all recognized by the innate immune system, which can lead to both localized and systemic inflammation. A more recently appreciated mechanism of herpesvirus innate immune activation is through inflammasome signaling. The inflammasome is an intracellular multiprotein complex that, when activated, leads to the release of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β and IL-18, and activation of the inflammatory programed cell death pathway known as pyroptosis. Despite the herpesviruses sharing a similar structure, their mechanisms of inflammasome activation and the consequences of inflammasome activation in cases of virus-associated disease are not uniform. This review will highlight the similarities and differences among herpesviruses with regard to their mechanisms of inflammasome activation and impacts on diseases caused by herpesviruses. Furthermore, it will identify areas where additional studies are warranted to better understand the impact of this important innate immune signaling program on the pathogenesis of these common viruses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".