Art And Exceptionality: Addressing Art Fear And Fear Of Difference In An Introductory Art Course
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: University educators designed and co-taught a course which involved collaborative artmaking and learning with a community-based arts organization that serves individuals with disabilities. Their goal was to help university students examine the potential of art and how it applies to their personal and professional lives. They sought to better understand how to nurture a feeling of artistic agency in undergraduate students who do not define themselves as artists. Educators found that students benefited from an exploration of art fear through an inclusive approach to art creation. Keywords: Art fear; Disability; Collaborative artmaking; Higher education; Experiential learning. Résumé : Des éducatrices et éducateurs universitaires ont conçu et co-enseigné un cours axé sur la création artistique et l’apprentissage coopératif au sein d’un organisme communautaire voué aux arts qui dessert des personnes en situation de handicap. Leur objectif était d’aider les étudiant.e.s universitaires à analyser le potentiel de l’art et son impact sur leur vie personnelle et professionnelle. Ils voulaient savoir comment alimenter une volonté d’action artistique chez des étudiant.e.s de premier cycle qui ne se considèrent pas des artistes. Les éducatrices et les éducateurs ont remarqué qu’aborder la peur de l’art sous une optique de création artistique inclusive était bénéfique. Mots-clés : peur de l’art, handicap, création artistique collaborative, éducation supérieure, apprentissage expérientiel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".