MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206269949 · doi:10.1109/tim.2022.3144235

Open-Circuit Fault Detection and Isolation Method for Five-Level PUC Inverter Based on the Wavelet Packet Transform of the Radiated Magnetic Field

2022· article· en· W4206269949 on OpenAlexaff
Ibtissem Abari, Mahmoud Hamouda, Mohammad Sleiman, Jaleleddine Ben Hadj Slama, Hadi Y. Kanaan, Kamal Al‐Haddad

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault detection and isolationInverterTopology (electrical circuits)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Fault (geology)Wavelet packet decompositionWavelet transformEngineeringWaveletElectrical engineeringVoltageControl (management)ActuatorArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes a noninvasive open-switch fault detection method based on the analysis of the high-frequency signals. The faulty power switch is detected by metering the emitted near-field above a new topology using the wavelet packet transform and considering a complex control algorithm. The proposed method is tested on a single-phase five-level packed U-cell (PUC5) inverter. The latter is controlled using the finite-control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) technique that generates the gate signals with a variable switching frequency. Moreover, unlike the conventional pulsewidth modulation strategy, the switching pattern provided by the FCS-MPC technique is not known in advance. Despite these complexities, the proposed fault detection method proves its high performance and effectiveness. Experimental studies are carried out on a single-phase PUC5 inverter using the real-time controller (OP4510) from OPAL-RT and prove the capability of this method to properly identify the faulty switch in this multilevel topology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207