MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206276882 · doi:10.1144/geochem2021-063

Controls on groundwater selenium, arsenic and base metals in groundwater around a selenium-bearing volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit: constraints from stable isotopes, trace elements and redox controls

2022· article· en· W4206276882 on OpenAlexaffabout
Matthew I. Leybourne, Daniel Layton‐Matthews, Jan M. Peter, J.A. Kidder

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Exploration Environment Analysis · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaArthur B. McDonald-Canadian Astroparticle Physics Research InstituteQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeleniumArsenicGroundwaterSulfideGeologyEnvironmental chemistrySulfide mineralsRedoxGeochemistryBase metalPyriteChemistryMetallurgyGeotechnical engineeringInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the controls on the behaviour of metalloids (Se, As) and metals (Cu, Zn, Pb) in natural aqueous systems is vital to interpreting hydrogeochemical data in environmental and mineral exploration applications. Geochemical, isotopic and redox measurements of a suite of groundwaters sampled from around the ABM zone of the Kudz Ze Kayah (KZK) volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposit in the Yukon, Canada are presented and contrasted with other case studies from a variety of mineral deposit types. This deposit has atypically high As (up to 4.3 wt%, average 2457 ppm) and Se (up to 2620 ppm, average 157 ppm) contents in the sulfide mineralization. As a relatively undisturbed deposit (unmined), it is an ideal site to study the mobility and solubility of trace metals in groundwaters. Herein we present field measurements (pH, dissolved oxygen, specific conductance, oxidation–reduction potential and temperature), major ion, trace element, anion (Cl, Br, SO 4 , PO 4 ), and stable isotope ( δ 2 H, δ 13 C DIC , δ 18 O, δ 18 O SO4 , δ 34 S) data. Waters are dominantly low-salinity HCO 3 to HCO 3 –SO 4 -type waters with variable sulfate (4.83 to 601 mg l −1 ), Ca (23–235 mg l −1 ) Mg (3.1–96.8 mg l −1 ), Na (0.30–66.9 mg l −1 ) and K (0.55 to 6.25 mg l −1 ) concentrations. These waters also have variable trace element concentrations that include As (0.01 to 148 µg l –1 ), Se (<0.02 to 1.01 µg l –1 ), Fe (0.01 to 3.84 mg l −1 ), Zn (<0.2 to 1070 µg l –1 ), Pb (<0.01 to 8.4 µg l –1 ), Cu (0.03 and 24.5 µg l –1 ) and Sb (0.01 to 54.4 µg l –1 ). Some waters also have elevated concentrations (compared to most meteoric waters) of Nb (up to 0.3 µg l –1 ), Y (up to 1.42 µg l –1 ), Zr (up to 18 µg l –1 ), and the rare-earth elements (REEs) ( Σ REE up to 2.04 µg l –1 ). The δ 18 O (−22.8 to −20.9 ‰) and δ 2 H (−174 to −158 ‰), together with the δ 13 C DIC (−10.6 to +1.9 ‰), δ 34 S (+10 to +12 ‰) and δ 18 O SO4 (15.5 to −4.75 ‰) all suggest that local meteoric water has interacted with massive sulfide mineralization at the ABM zone. Our results demonstrate the requirement for the use of multiple techniques in hydrogeochemical studies, with dissolved concentrations of major and trace elements coupled with a suite of stable isotopes that help define a larger geochemical footprint for the KZK deposit. Water–mineral interaction between groundwater aquifers and VMS deposits like the ABM zone are distinctly different from dispersion halos described from other deposit types (i.e. Cu porphyry, unconformity U). Thematic collection: This article is part of the Hydrochemistry related to exploration and environmental issues collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/hydrochemistry-related-to-exploration-and-environmental-issues

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochemistry Exploration Environment AnalysisSame topicGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryFrench-language works237,207