MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206284774 · doi:10.22215/etd/2021-14650

Model-Order Reduction of Massively Coupled Parameterized Systems via Clustering

2021· dissertation· en· W4206284774 on OpenAlexaff
Jaydip Kathrotiya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel order reductionComputer scienceReduction (mathematics)Parameterized complexityParametric statisticsAlgorithmSuperposition principleCluster analysisMonte Carlo methodMatching (statistics)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsArtificial intelligenceProjection (relational algebra)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parametrized Model Order Reduction(PMOR) methods reduce the full equations for large parametric networks into a reduced number of parametrized equations. The reduced model is obtained to match the variations in the response of the original full circuit due to variations in its key design parameters. Applying existing PMOR techniques to parametrized systems with many inputs often results in extremely large and dense reduced-order models. This thesis presents a new approach to construct parametrized reduced-order models for multi-parameter networks with many input/output terminals. The new method leverages the efficient application of the multi-parameter moment-matching-based approach by exploiting the superposition paradigm. Solving the resulting overall reduced system to obtain variations in the original circuit response yields significant computational savings. The presented algorithm is an effective means to manage the Monte Carlo simulations of large multiport parametrized linear networks. It is highly suited for multithreading implementation and thus facilitates parallel time-domain variability analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207