MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206289652 · doi:10.2514/6.2022-2253

Assessment of PAH-Based Precursor Models Using a Seven-Moment Quadrature-Based Closure for Soot Formation Prediction in Non-Premixed Laminar Flames

2022· article· en· W4206289652 on OpenAlexaff
Jacques Xing, C. P. T. Groth

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSootLaminar flowMoment closureDiffusion flameThermodynamicsMaterials scienceCombustionChemistryOrganic chemistryPhysicsCombustor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-2253.vid The accurate numerical prediction of soot formation in practical combustion devices remains an open challenge. A recently proposed and computationally efficient quadrature-based moment closure based on fractional-order moments of soot particle volume, which is also capable of both capturing the polydispersity and key structural features of soot aggregates, is used here to explore the influence of the choice of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)-based soot precursors on the formation, evolution, and oxidation of soot in ethylene-air laminar diffusion flames at atmospheric pressures. In particular, a seven-moment Conditional Quadrature Method of Moments (CQMOM) with a fixed quadrature point at the soot particle inception size, resulting in a so-called CQMOM-Radau closure, is used to explore the influence of the choice of soot precusors on soot formation prediction in laminar diffusion flames at atmospheric pressures. The CQMOM-Radau closure of interest involves the solution of a relatively small system of seven moment equations describing the soot transport but yet allows for a bivariate treatment and detailed modelling of the gas-phase chemistry along with treatments for soot particle nucleation, condensation, surface growth, oxidation, coagulation, sintering, obliteration, and fragmentation. The soot formation predictions of the seven-moment closure obtained using several PAH-based soot precursor models are investigated and compared to predictions obtained using a standard acetylene-based two-equation model, as well as available experimental data, for several atmospheric pressure laminar co-flow diffusion flames with ethylene as the fuel. The relative performances of the various PAH-based precursors for predicting the observed soot concentrations, particles sizes, and structure are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA SCITECH 2022 ForumSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207