Effect of the Heating Rate on Austenite Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The extent of the heat-affected zone (HAZ) in welding is typically estimated from thermodynamic considerations of austenization; however, thermodynamics are a poor predictor of the HAZ location in microalloyed steels. This work addresses the problem through the study of austenite formation during continuous heating on a grade X80 pipeline steel with an initial ferritic and bainitic microstructure. The methodology involved dilatometry, electron microscopy, and thermodynamic calculations. A continuous heating transformation diagram was developed for heating rates varying from 1˚ to 500˚C/s. For the slower heating rates, austenite start-transformation temperature was higher than the one dictated by the equilibrium, while for the faster heating rates, start-transformation temperature gradually approached the theoretically calculated temperature at which the ferrite can transform (possibly through a massive transformation) without a long-range diffusion into austenite. Partial-transformation experiments suggested that austenite formation occurs in the following two stages: 1) the transformation of bainitic zones into austenite, and later, 2) the transformation of polygonal ferritic grains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".