Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Thalidomide for Treating Patients With ß-Thalassemia: A Meta-Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At present, the main therapies for ß -thalassemia patients include regular blood transfusion and iron chelation, associating with a number of limitations. Thalidomide, a fetal hemoglobin (HbF) inducer that promotes γ-globin gene expression, has been reported to be effective for ß -thalassemia. Thus, this meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of thalidomide for treating patients with ß -thalassemia. We searched the related studies from eight databases published from inception until December 1, 2021. The R 4.0.5 language programming was used to perform meta-analysis. After screening of retrieved articles, 12 articles were included that enrolled a total of 451 patients. The Cochrane Collaboration risk assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality and the bias risk of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and non randomized trials were assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). After treatment with thalidomide, the pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 85% (95% confidence interval (CI): 80–90%), and the pooled complete response rate (CRR) was 54% (95% confidence interval: 31–76%). Compared with the placebo group, the thalidomide group had higher odds of overall response rate (odds ratio = 20.4; 95% CI: 6.75–61.64) and complete response rate (odds ratio = 20.4; 95% CI: 6.75–61.64). A statistically significant increase in hemoglobin level and HbF level after treatment, while there was no statistically significant difference in adult hemoglobin (HbA) level, spleen size, and serum ferritin. According to the results of ORR and CRR, transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) patients showed remarkable efficacy of thalidomide, 83 and 52% respectively. So we analyzed 30 transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients from three studies and found that the most frequent ß -globin gene mutations were CD41-42 (-TCTT), while response to thalidomide did not show any statistically significant relationship with XmnI polymorphism or CD41-42 (-TCTT) mutation. About 30% of patients experienced mild adverse effects of thalidomide. Collectively, thalidomide is a relatively safe and effective therapy to reduce the blood transfusion requirements and to increase Hb level in patients with ß -thalassemia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".