Application of kinetic pyrolysis models to the analysis of flax chipboards under fire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a three-dimensional finite element model to describe the thermomechanical behaviour of flax chipboards under fire conditions. The model is based on kinetic models considering the thermal degradation during the pyrolysis phase and the evolution of the physico-mechanical properties as functions of temperature. The numerical model is integrated into Abaqus via user subroutines (Umat and Umatht) and applied to the analysis of the fire behaviour of panels made of flax chipboards. Thermogravimetric tests are performed on flax particles to serve for the identification of the kinetic parameters of the pyrolysis models. Once these kinetic parameters are determined, they are integrated into a complete numerical model to simulate the behaviour under fire of flax chipboards on small and large scales. The obtained trends in the predicted values indicate good agreements when compared to the measured values. The simulations show that the numerical model is capable of accurately modelling the thermomechanical transfers taking place within the material during exposure to fire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".