Le vécu des jeunes membres de gang de rue dévoilé dans leurs slams et leurs raps (The Experiences of Young Street Gang Members Revealed in Their Slams and Raps)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude expose une analyse phénoménologique de 16 textes écrits lors d’un projet de disque de raps et d’un atelier d’écriture de slams par les membres de gang de rue en centre jeunesse à Montréal. Peu loquaces en thérapie, nous avons cherché ce que ces jeunes y ont dévoilé de leur vécu, afin d’éclairer leur parole et de fournir une validation supplémentaire du dispositif en contexte thérapeutique chez cette population. Nos résultats démontrent la validité du rap et du slam pour libérer leur expression, en plus de leur pertinence pour aborder les enjeux mis en lumière, notamment l’insécurité possiblement liée au trauma et le désespoir découlant d’un milieu manquant de ressources. D’autres études seraient nécessaires afin d’approfondir les connaissances sur les troubles intériorisés de ces jeunes, ainsi que sur le vécu ambivalent de leur prise en charge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".