P.097 Adrenal Insufficiency among Children treated with Hormonal Therapy for Infantile Spasms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Hormonal therapy is a standard treatment for infantile spasms. The high doses given and long treatment duration expose patients to the risk of adrenal insufficiency (AI). This study aims to quantify the incidence of AI among children with infantile spasms treated with corticosteroids and/or adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients treated for infantile spasms was performed between January 2009 to March 2020 in one pediatric specialized hospital. Variables collected included patient and treatment characteristics, risk factors of AI and adrenal function testing. Analysis included descriptive statistics. Results: Thirty-one patients met the inclusion criteria and received a total of 33 separated courses of treatment. Adrenal function following each course of treatment was evaluated in all patients. AI occurred in 25/33 (76% [95CI 58-89]) children. There was no predictive factor of AI. No drug regimen was deemed safe. The two patients (6%) with an acute adrenal crisis were the youngest of the cohort. Conclusions: Adrenal suppression is frequent and can lead to adrenal crisis after standard hormonal therapy for infantile spasms. A routine laboratory assessment of adrenal function should be done for all patients. Hydrocortisone replacement therapy should be given until testing results are obtained, particularly for younger infants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".