MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Editorial Comment

2021· editorial· es· W4206372108 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rodney H. Breau, Avril Lusty

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstatectomyKetorolacFoley catheterGeneral surgeryCatheterLaparoscopic radical prostatectomyUrologySurgeryAnesthesiaProstateInternal medicineAnalgesic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Jun 2021Editorial CommentThis article comments on the following:Intraoperative Strategies to Reduce Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort in the Early Postoperative Period after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomyis a letter which has replyReply by Authors Rodney H. Breau, and Avril Lusty Rodney H. BreauRodney H. Breau Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author , and Avril LustyAvril Lusty Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001645.01AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Editorial Comment." The Journal of Urology, 205(6), pp. 1679–1680 References 1. ClinicalTrials.com: Search results for robotic prostatectomy pain studies. Available at https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=robotic+prostatectomy+pain&term=&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=. Accessed January 20, 2021. Google Scholar 2. : The effect of intrathecal bupivacaine/morphine on quality of recovery in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2020; 75: 599. Google Scholar 3. : Effect of ketorolac on the prevention of postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Med 2019; 8: 759. Google Scholar © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesJournal of UrologyFeb 19, 2021, 12:00:00 AMIntraoperative Strategies to Reduce Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort in the Early Postoperative Period after Robot-Assisted Radical ProstatectomyJournal of UrologyMar 18, 2021, 12:00:00 AMReply by Authors Volume 205Issue 6June 2021Page: 1679-1680 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Rodney H. Breau Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Avril Lusty Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.065
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.905

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.065
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0130.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3650.210

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Urology→Same topicAnesthesia and Pain Management→French-language works237,207→