MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206376016 · doi:10.21608/ejas.2021.183801

ASSESSMENT OF FATIGUE AND ITS CORRELATION WITH QUALITY OF LIFE AND FUNCTION DISABILITY IN OSTEOARTHRITIC PATIENTS

2021· article· en· W4206376016 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Naira Mohamed, Magda Zahran, Abeer Yamny

Bibliographic record

VenueEgyptian Journal of Applied Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrelationQuality of life (healthcare)MedicinePhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic, degenerative, inflammatorymusculoskeletal dysfunction. It is associated with pain, reduced functionalcapacity and deficient quality of life. Fatigue is a frequent complaint in patientswith arthritis, which correlate to tiredness. Purpose of the study: This studyaimed to assess fatigue in knee osteoarthritic patients and to correlate it toquality-of-life indexes and functional disability. Subjects and Methods: Thiscross-sectional study was performed on 200patients of both sex with agesranged from 50 to 65 years old and medical diagnoses of knee osteoarthritiseither grade II or grade III. The participants were selected according to thedemographic survey including information on their age, gender, educationallevel, height, weight, BMI, disease duration. Fatigue was measured by Arabicversion of fatigue severity scale; quality of life was measured by Arabic versionof SF36 questionnaire and function disability was measured by Arabic versionof The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index(WOMAC). Results: 200 patients were included in the study. Grade II group < br />consisted of 39 patients (3 male and 36female), grade III consisted of 161patients (31 male and 131female). The results indicated that there wassignificant difference in the fatigue severity scale between both groups with (Uvalue=2019, Z-value= -3.458, p = 0.001*), this significant increase in grade IIIgroup in compared to grade II group. There was a positive weak correlationbetween fatigue severity scale and WOMAC (p=0.0001*). And There was anegative weak correlation between fatigue and pain domain of SF36questionnaire (p=0.0001*) and there was a negative weak correlation betweenfatigue severity scale and fatigue domain of SF36 questionnaire (p=0.002*).Conclusion: On the basis of this study, it could be concluded that there is anassociation between fatigue and both disability and quality of life in patientswith knee osteoarthritis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEgyptian Journal of Applied ScienceSame topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207