Towards Real-Time Public Health: A Novel Mobile Health Monitoring System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Public health monitoring methods have limitations that affect the quality of data. To support traditional data collection efforts, personal smart technologies can be used to collect multimodal, real-time and continuous data. Public health agencies can then study and predict the prevalence of conditions in a population using advanced analytics. Apple Health is one of the most popular sources of health data from personal devices, supporting diverse sensors that collect a wide range of information from heart rate to blood pressure and sleep. This paper introduces a system that uses a mobile health platform to extract Apple Health data to support public health monitoring. Development, security and privacy considerations are discussed, and a pilot study is proposed which collects several objective sensor data from Apple Health as well as self-report perceived stress (both using the platform) to create stress prediction models. Ultimately, the system described can provide public health agencies with novel methods to collect multimodal data from consumer devices as well as implement interventions in real-time to minimize the impact of conditions, such as stress, in a population. The system advances the state-of-the-art in health monitoring by being one of the first works to leverage health data from consumer-level personal devices for public health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it