MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4206382871 · doi:10.1139/w01-069

Precise excision of bacteriophage Mu DNA

2001· article· en· W4206382871 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chiraz Abbes, Guennadi Sezonov, Danièle Joseleau‐Petit, Richard D’Ari, Jean-Claude Liébart

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAssociation pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
KeywordsProphageTransposable elementBacteriophage MuBiologyPlasmidBacteriophageGeneticsEscherichia coliGeneTemperatenesslac operonDNAInsertion sequenceMutantMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The temperate bacteriophage Mu is a transposable element that can integrate randomly into bacterial DNA, thereby creating mutations. Mutants due to an integrated Mu prophage do not give rise to revertants, as if Mu, unlike other transposable elements, were unable to excise precisely. In the present work, starting with a lacZ::Muc62(Ts) strain unable to form Lac+colonies, we cloned a lacZ+gene in vivo on a mini-Mu plasmid, under conditions of prophage induction. In all lac+plasmids recovered, the wild-type sequence was restored in the region where the Mu prophage had been integrated. The recovery of lacZ+genes shows that precise excision of Mu does indeed take place; the absence of Lac+colonies suggests that precise excision events are systematically associated with loss of colony-forming ability.Key words: transposable element, Escherichia coli, mini-Muduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Microbiology→Same topicBacteriophages and microbial interactions→French-language works237,207→