MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206389414 · doi:10.5430/jct.v11n1p87

Interactive Learning in the Preparation of Students 1-4 Grades

2022· article· en· W4206389414 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hanna Byhar, Iryna Pits, І. A. Prokop, Krystyna Shevchuk, Olha Shestobuz, Олеся Маковійчук

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum and Teaching · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInnovative Educational Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationInteractive LearningTeaching methodComputer scienceSelection (genetic algorithm)Empirical researchUkrainianPsychologyMultimediaMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to identify effective interactive methods in preparing students in grades 1-4, as well as to investigate their impact on learning outcomes. The work uses theoretical and empirical methods. The analysis of existing interactive teaching methods, their selection in accordance with the age characteristics of primary school students and educational needs. Also, a pedagogical experiment was carried out based on the implementation of the developed model of using interactive teaching methods in grades 1-4 of general secondary education institutions and monitoring the learning outcomes obtained in this case. A survey of teachers and students was carried out. The study showed that the use of interactive methods in the lessons of the Ukrainian language and mathematics contributes to the growth of students' interest in studying these disciplines. As a result, there is an increase in the level of educational achievements of students from average to sufficient, and in some cases from sufficient to high. Thus, in this work it is proved that the proposed model of teaching using interactive methods that take into account the age and individual characteristics of students is highly effective. Further research should be carried out with the aim of correcting existing interactive methods in accordance with the modern educational needs of students and their individual characteristics. Research is also needed to identify new interactive methods and study their impact on learning outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Curriculum and TeachingSame topicInnovative Educational TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207