MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206398617 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-112174

Integrated Safety Results from the Phase II and Phase III Studies with Caplacizumab in Patients with Acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

2018· article· en· W4206398617 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Knöbl, Marie Scully, Spero R. Cataland, Flora Peyvandi, Paul Coppo, Johanna A. Kremer Hovinga, Ara Metjian, Javier de la Rubia, Katerina Pavenski, Jessica Minkue, Filip Callewaert, Hilde De Winter

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTolerabilityInternal medicineMedicinePopulationAdverse effectGastroenterologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction : During the clinical development of caplacizumab, safety and tolerability data have been accrued from Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III studies in 3 discrete populations, comprising patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP), patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; indication is not being pursued), and healthy patients. Given that caplacizumab blocks the interaction of the Willebrand factor (vWF) A1 domain with the GPIb-IX-V platelet receptor, the main expected safety risk is bleeding. Methods : The objective of this integrated analysis is to characterize the safety and tolerability of caplacizumab based on summaries of data from the pooled Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III studies, with a main focus on the safety data from the Phase II and Phase III studies in the aTTP Population, (i.e., the TITAN and HERCULES studies). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and clinical laboratory evaluations (hematology, biochemistry, and coagulation markers) were evaluated and summarized. Treatment-emergent bleeding was specified as an event of special interest. Data were analyzed during the double-blind (DB)/single-blind (SB) treatment period, and during the overall study period (including the follow-up period) for the aTTP population. R esults : Safety data for caplacizumab have been accrued in 790 patients within the 3 populations (220 aTTP patients, 410 PCI patients, and 160 healthy patients). In the pooled aTTP population, 216 (98.2%) patients received at least one dose of study drug (i.e., Safety Population), 106 patients in the caplacizumab group and 110 patients in the placebo group. The median duration of exposure to study drug was 35.0 days in the caplacizumab group and 32.5 days in the placebo group. Similar percentages of patients were reported with TEAEs in the caplacizumab (96.2%) and placebo (95.5%) groups. Events that occurred more frequently (≥5% difference) in the caplacizumab group vs. placebo were epistaxis (29.2% vs. 5.5%), headache (20.8% vs 13.6%) and gingival bleeding (16.0% vs 2.7%). The majority of these events were mild in intensity. Events that occurred more frequently in the placebo group were TTP (35.5% vs 5.7%), hypokalaemia (20.0% vs 12.3%), and hypertension (12.7% vs 4.7%). Relative risks were calculated for the most frequent TEAEs (Figure 1). Patients in the caplacizumab group had a significantly higher risk of experiencing gingival bleeding and epistaxis. Patients in the placebo group had a significantly higher risk of TTP recurrence and hypertension. Study drug discontinuation due to TEAEs occurred with similar frequencies in the caplacizumab (6.6%) and placebo (10.0%) groups, and were mostly individual events with the exception of TTP and myocardial infarction. A lower percentage of patients experienced SAEs in the caplacizumab group (29.2%) vs. placebo (49.1%). The most frequently reported SAE was TTP in both the caplacizumab (5.7%) and placebo (34.5%) groups. All other SAEs were reported in less than 5% of the patients. A higher percentage of patients experienced bleeding TEAEs in the caplacizumab group (60.4%) than in the placebo group (42.7%). Bleeding TEAEs were mainly mucocutaneous, most were self-limited and the majority resolved. Results from laboratory tests showed a general normalization of key hematology and chemistry parameters over time. Both treatment groups were similar with respect to clinically notable laboratory values, with very few abnormalities reported as TEAEs. The safety profile of caplacizumab observed in other populations was similar to that observed in the aTTP population, with no new safety signals identified. Bleeding TEAEs were the most commonly reported events in healthy patients and PCI patients. Conclusions : Bleeding TEAEs, chiefly epistaxis and gingival bleeding, were the most common TEAEs in patients treated with caplacizumab. Results from laboratory tests confirmed the safety profile of caplacizumab. No new safety signals were identified in the other populations studied. This integrated analysis has shown that caplacizumab is well tolerated and has a favorable safety profile. Disclosures Knöbl: Ablynx: Consultancy, Other: Member of Advisory Board. Scully:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Member of Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau. Cataland:Alexion: Research Funding; Shire: Consultancy; Ablynx: Consultancy, Other: Member of Advisory Board. Peyvandi:Shire: Speakers Bureau; Octapharma US: Honoraria; Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Kedrion: Consultancy; Ablynx: Other: Member of Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Octapharma US: Honoraria; Octapharma US: Honoraria; Kedrion: Consultancy; Octapharma US: Honoraria; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Octapharma US: Honoraria; Ablynx: Other: Member of Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Ablynx: Other: Member of Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Kedrion: Consultancy; Grifols: Speakers Bureau; Kedrion: Consultancy; Kedrion: Consultancy; Ablynx: Other: Member of Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Ablynx: Other: Member of Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau. Coppo:Ablynx: Consultancy. Kremer Hovinga:Ablynx: Other: Member of Advisory Board; Shire: Other: Member of Advisory Board, Research Funding. Metjian:Ablynx: Other: Member of Advisory Board. De La Rubia:Ablynx: Consultancy, Other: Member of Advisory Board. Minkue:Ablynx: Employment. Callewaert:Ablynx: Employment. De Winter:Ablynx: Employment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.367
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207