MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206401733 · doi:10.1080/01490451.2021.2020936

Compressive Strength of MICP-Treated Silica Sand with Different Particle Morphologies and Gradings

2022· article· en· W4206401733 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeomicrobiology Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Applications in Construction Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersState Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Gas Geology and Gas ControlNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCementation (geology)Materials scienceParticle (ecology)Compressive strengthComposite materialScanning electron microscopeParticle sizeCalcium carbonateCarbonateMorphology (biology)MineralogyPrecipitationGeologyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microbially-induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) can enhance the stiffness and bulk strength of sand aggregates via calcium carbonate cementation. This study explores the mechanical strength of silica sand aggregates with different particle morphologies and sizes following MICP treatment. Specifically, unconfined uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of MICP-treated spherical, near-spherical, and angular aggregates are measured for four separate size fractions (18–25, 25–40, 40–60, and 60–80 mesh). Scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging is performed on post-treatment samples to investigate the difference in cementation morphology and failure mechanisms. The experimental results indicate: (1) given identical cycles of MICP treatment, the UCS of treated spherical and near-spherical sands peaks at 25–40 mesh particle size, while the treated angular sands show increasing UCS with decreasing particle size; (2) spherical sands have the highest calcium carbonate (CaCO3) content given identical MICP cycles; and (3) higher post-treatment CaCO3 content does not correlate to higher UCS—implying that the distribution and morphology of CaCO3 precipitation exert crucial control. SEM analysis shows that CaCO3 fully encapsulates spherical sand particles uniformly, forming point contact bonds. In contrast, CaCO3 precipitations show a patchy distribution on near-spherical and angular sand grain surfaces. Unlike treated spherical sands, treated near-spherical sands feature a mixture of point and planar contact bonds while treated angular sands feature predominantly planar contact bonds. Planar contact bonds provide a larger effective cementation area between sand particles and thus result in higher bonding strength. The particle morphology and resultant inter-particle bonding morphology help reconcile higher ensemble UCS with lower CaCO3 content of treated angular sands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it