Bibliographic record
Abstract
In one jurisdiction, a political adviser's immediate response to the horrors of 11 September 2001 is to send out an email to civil servants suggesting that it is a 'very good day' to 'get out anything we want to bury'.The following year, the same adviser reputedly sought to exploit the day of Princess Margaret's funeral to release unfavourable statistics that would not refl ect well on her minister's stewardship of his portfolio.The head of communications in the department -a 'permanent' civil servantresponded with an email of his own: 'Dear Jo, there is no way I will allow this department to make any substantive announcements next Friday.Princess Margaret is being buried on that day.I will absolutely not allow anything else to be.'The Public Administration Select Committee of the House of Commons inquires into these 'unfortunate events' in the Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, and concludes in part that: the handling of the events demonstrates serious fl aws in the management and accountability of special advisers.The crisis was caused partly by the fact that Ms Moore took on a series of executive and, in eff ect, managerial tasks without reference to proper procedures.In addition, a number of civil servants abandoned professional standards by leaking information and misinformation in a way intended to undermine Ms Moore.Management found itself unable to prevent a catastrophic taking of sides at senior level in the department.(United Kingdom Parliament 2002, p. 5) In another jurisdiction, the Government of the day, in the course of an election campaign, makes much of the fact that asylum seekers, attempting to enter the country illegally, are threatening to 'throw their children overboard'.Subsequently it emerges that political staff in the relevant minister's offi ce were aware of the fact that photographs purportedly providing evidence of children having been thrown overboard were, in fact, of individuals being rescued following the sinking of their vessel.The responsible minister and indeed the Prime Minister, deny ever being
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.414 | 0.199 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".