Superpixel-Based Cropland Classification of SAR Image With Statistical Texture and Polarization Features
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cropland classification can be used to monitor cropland distribution and its change over time. In this letter, a new superpixel-based cropland classification method is proposed for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery through the integration of statistical texture, polarization, and spatial information. First, the method combines random forest algorithm and superpixels, which are generated using simple linear iterative clustering algorithm with polarization features of Pauli decomposition and spatial information. Superpixel-based spatial context information is used to reduce the influence of coherent speckle and misclassification in cropland blocks. Second,$G^{0}$statistical texture feature is used to reduce the interference of background targets such as woodland in cropland classification. Comparison experiments of different methods using C-band airborne SAR (AIRSAR) polarimetric data acquired in early July show that the proposed method has better classification performance, with an overall accuracy of 88.62%. The classification accuracy of corn and soybean is above 95% and 91%, respectively. The$G^{0}$statistical texture feature is helpful to eliminate woodland that may cause crop misclassification using single-date SAR image.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".