MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206433092 · doi:10.1109/tie.2020.2988806

IEEE Industrial Electronics Society

2020· article· en· W4206433092 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSoutheast UniversityUniversità di BolognaKhalifa University of Science, Technology and ResearchArgonne National LaboratoryIndian Institute of Technology MadrasConnaught FundUniversity of Technology SydneyHarbin Institute of TechnologyUniversidade de PernambucoDalhousie UniversityBeihang UniversityYork UniversityUniversity of WollongongKeio UniversityHamad Bin Khalifa UniversityAlexandria UniversityMississippi State UniversityUniversité de Franche-ComtéUniversidade de VigoTexas Tech UniversityNorthwestern University
KeywordsElectronicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringManufacturing engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

interest in electronics and electrical sciences as applied to control, treatment, and measurement of industrial processes. For membership and subscription information and pricing, please

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it