MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206440582 · doi:10.1353/ohq.2013.0067

OregonScape

2013· article· en· W4206440582 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchaeologyBridge (graph theory)Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

 Oregonscape Crossing the Columbia River has long been a major undertaking. During much of the nineteenth century, ferries and boats provided the only means of moving from one side of the river to the other. In the 1890s, railroad bridges began to allow trains to move between Oregon and Washington, and in 1917, the Interstate Bridge opened, connecting Portland with Vancouver, Washington. A few years later, work began on another river crossing, this time at Cascade Locks. The impressive Bridge of the Gods opened in 1926, allowing wagons, trucks, and cars to pass ninety feet above river traffic. In September of the following year, aviator Charles Lindbergh flew along the river on his way to Portland as part of a cross-country tour celebrating his famous Atlantic flight. He circled over the bridge and flew underneath the central span before continuing on to the airport at Swan Island. Unfortunately for history, he decided to do the stunt on the spur of the moment, and no cameras were on hand to record the event. When the Bonneville Dam was built in the 1930s, the Columbia River began to change from the wild river Lewis and Clark saw to the navigable stream it is today. The water that backed up behind the dam widened the river, and in 1940, the Bridge of the Gods was raised 50 feet and lengthened by over 700 feet to accommodate the changed river. That project took about three months, and this photograph documents the process about ten days before the bridge reopened. — Mikki Tint, former special collections librarian, OHS Research Library Learn more about the Bridge of the Gods at www.ohs.org/research/quarterly/oregonscape.cfm. ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it