Light as a Resource, Stressor and Cue in Mediating Diversity-Productivity Relationships in Forests
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In closed-canopy forests, the availability of photosynthetically active light has been a focal point of research, emphasizing the role of light as a resource in limiting carbon assimilation and individual tree growth. However, light shapes the functioning of forest ecosystems through multiple mechanisms. Here, using a series of studies from a network of tree diversity experiments, we explore the multifaceted ways in which light---in terms of both quantity and quality---shapes productivity in mixed-species forests. Spectral reflectance from remote sensing of forest canopies is being increasingly used to detect how tree diversity influences productivity. We demonstrate that airborne imaging spectroscopy captures functionally important differences among canopies related to their structure, chemistry, and underlying biological interactions. Ground-based analyses can show in detail how photosynthetically active light is partitioned among species in mixed-species communities. We show that greater interception of light and greater efficiency of light use, generated by inter- and intra-specific differences, combine to enhance productivity in mixed-species forests. Light may shape forest function not only as a resource but also as a stressor and cue. Plants can perceive light at various wavelengths, use this information to assess their neighborhoods, and subsequently adjust their physiology and allocation. We characterize how light quality---from the ultraviolet to shortwave infrared---varies among and within canopies of differing diversity. We explore how these diversity-light quality relationships arise and connect across levels of biological organization from leaf-level trait expression to forest function. Together these studies lend insight into light-mediated mechanisms that drive relationships between biodiversity and productivity in forest ecosystems---insights that are crucial to predict how biodiversity change will affect future forest function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".