MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206479492 · doi:10.1109/ias.2005.1518824

Effects of EHD and external air flows on electric corona discharge in pin-plate configuration

2005· article· en· W4206479492 on OpenAlexaff
Lin Zhao, Kazimierz Adamiak

Bibliographic record

VenueFourtieth IAS Annual Meeting. Conference Record of the 2005 Industry Applications Conference, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrohydrodynamicsCorona dischargeMechanicsAirflowCorona (planetary geology)Electric fieldFlow (mathematics)Ion windCurrent densityFinite volume methodFinite element methodCorona ringBoundary value problemMaterials sciencePhysicsElectrodeThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of airflow, including the electrohydrodynamic (EHD) flow produced by the electric corona discharge, and the flow generated externally on the corona discharge has been investigated numerically in this paper. Contrary to the common assumption that the corona discharge and the EHD flow can be decoupled by neglecting the convection term in the current density equation, the equations for the electric field, charge transport and fluid flow have been solved simultaneously. The numerical algorithm is based on the boundary and finite element methods (BEM and FEM), the method of characteristics (MOC) and the finite volume method (FVM). The simulation results confirm that the EHD flow has a very small effect on the corona discharge. However, in some configurations the external airflow may have considerable effect on the V-I characteristics of the system and the current density distribution on the ground electrode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFourtieth IAS Annual Meeting. Conference Record of the 2005 Industry Applications Conference, 2005.Same topicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationFrench-language works237,207