Pattern of progression in MAPT‐related frontotemporal dementia: Results from the GENFI study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Mutations in MAPT are associated with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), but little is known about the progression in its early stages. We aimed at identifying the presence of early brain changes in MAPT mutation carriers. Method We included 3T MRIs from 84 MAPT carriers [27 symptomatic: mean(SD) age 58(8) years; 57 presymptomatic: 40(11) years] from the Genetic FTD Initiative (GENFI) and from 77 age‐matched non‐carrier healthy controls (44(14) years). Based on their expected years to symptom onset (EYO), we divided the presymptomatic carriers into early (n=35, <‐10 years) and late (n=22, >‐10 years) groups. First, we performed voxel‐based morphometry (VBM) comparing 24 symptomatic carriers with 32 controls to identify the regions of interest (ROIs) which were atrophic in the symptomatic stage of MAPT. We then used automated and manual segmentations to extract these ROI volumes in all carriers. To remove the effect of age, gender, total intracranial volume and scanner type, we transformed the volumes into w‐scores, considering the controls as the reference group. A w‐score of <‐1.28 (corresponding to the 10th percentile) was considered abnormal. Result From the VBM we identified seven structures significantly atrophic in symptomatic carriers: the nucleus accumbens, amygdala, hippocampus, orbitofrontal cortex, temporal pole, anterior insula and hypothalamus. The percentage of early presymptomatic carriers with abnormal w‐scores was 14% for nucleus accumbens and hippocampus, and 20% orbitofrontal cortex. In the late group, 36% showed abnormal amygdala and temporal pole, 27% abnormal hippocampus, 32% abnormal anterior insula and 9% abnormal hypothalamus. In the symptomatic group, the percentages were higher: nucleus accumbens (41%), amygdala, hippocampus and temporal pole (85%), orbitofrontal cortex (56%), anterior insula (93%) and hypothalamus (48%). Conclusion Abnormal limbic regions are a frequent feature in presymptomatic MAPT carriers, showing early structural changes before symptom onset. Further investigations on the associated cognitive and white matter changes are ongoing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".