MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206491640 · doi:10.1145/952576.952586

SOM

2003· article· no· W4206491640 on OpenAlexaffabout
D. J. Tufts-Conrad, A. Nur Zincir‐Heywood, David Zitner

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Applied computing - SAC '03 · 2003
Typearticle
Languageno
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMedical Coding and Health Information
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical diagnosisIdentification (biology)Computer scienceHospital dischargeFeature extractionSelf-organizing mapProcess (computing)Artificial intelligenceNarrativeArtificial neural networkFeature (linguistics)Patient dischargeInformation extractionNatural language processingInformation retrievalMedical emergencyMedicineMEDLINEProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In each Canadian province, hospitals collect information, at discharge, on the hospital stay of each patient. The information is collected in the form of a patient discharge abstract (PDA) and sent to the Canadian Institute for Health Information. The Patient Discharge Abstract uses the ICD-10-CA code standard to outline the assigned diagnoses for the patient's condition and the procedures that were performed. One compulsory piece of information in the Patient Discharge Abstract is the identification of the "most responsible diagnosis" (MRDx) -- that diagnosis considered to be the most significant condition of the patient that caused the greatest length of stay in hospital. This research investigates the potential for automating the process of feature extraction from a narrative patient discharge summary to support the classification of the MRDx for a Patient Discharge Abstract. Unsupervised neural networks -- Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) -- are effective for classification tasks based on noisy input patterns. Here a hierarchical architecture of SOMs is used to identify semantic similarities encoded in the original information and visualize the characteristics of an MRDx.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Applied computing - SAC '03Same topicMedical Coding and Health InformationFrench-language works237,207