MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206491640 · doi:10.1145/952576.952586

SOM

2003· article· no· W4206491640 on OpenAlexaffabout
D. J. Tufts-Conrad, A. Nur Zincir‐Heywood, David Zitner

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Applied computing - SAC '03 · 2003
Typearticle
Languageno
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMedical Coding and Health Information
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical diagnosisIdentification (biology)Computer scienceHospital dischargeFeature extractionSelf-organizing mapProcess (computing)Artificial intelligenceNarrativeArtificial neural networkFeature (linguistics)Patient dischargeInformation extractionNatural language processingInformation retrievalMedical emergencyMedicineMEDLINEProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In each Canadian province, hospitals collect information, at discharge, on the hospital stay of each patient. The information is collected in the form of a patient discharge abstract (PDA) and sent to the Canadian Institute for Health Information. The Patient Discharge Abstract uses the ICD-10-CA code standard to outline the assigned diagnoses for the patient's condition and the procedures that were performed. One compulsory piece of information in the Patient Discharge Abstract is the identification of the "most responsible diagnosis" (MRDx) -- that diagnosis considered to be the most significant condition of the patient that caused the greatest length of stay in hospital. This research investigates the potential for automating the process of feature extraction from a narrative patient discharge summary to support the classification of the MRDx for a Patient Discharge Abstract. Unsupervised neural networks -- Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) -- are effective for classification tasks based on noisy input patterns. Here a hierarchical architecture of SOMs is used to identify semantic similarities encoded in the original information and visualize the characteristics of an MRDx.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Applied computing - SAC '03Same topicMedical Coding and Health InformationFrench-language works237,207