MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206500352 · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3135003

QoS-Aware Hybrid Beamforming With Minimal Power in mmWave Massive MIMO Systems

2021· article· en· W4206500352 on OpenAlexaff
Mohsen Tajallifar, Ahmad R. Sharafat, Halim Yanıkömeroğlu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBeamformingMIMOQuality of serviceBasebandTransmitter power outputPrecodingElectronic engineeringComputer networkReal-time computingBandwidth (computing)TelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)EngineeringTransmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hybrid beamforming is used to leverage the benefits of both massive multiple input and multiple output (MIMO) systems and millimeter waves for significantly increasing the capacity of wireless networks. Existing schemes for hybrid beamforming in multiple radio frequency (RF) chains optimize a global measure of performance and ignore quality of service (QoS) per data stream. In this paper, we propose a novel scheme for hybrid beamforming to minimize the transmit power while satisfying the QoS defined as the mean square error (MSE), but other QoS measures can also be considered. To do so, we propose a two-stage cascade structure for the baseband precoder and combiner, and obtain their respective matrices in both single- and multi-user systems.We also propose a simplified scheme for designing the hybrid precoder and combiner with no nested while loops in the alternating optimization method. Simulations show less than 2 dB optimality gap for the multi-user scenario, with significantly less transmit power as compared to other existing schemes. Our simplified scheme exhibits negligible degradation in performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207