Image Recognition of Standard Actions in Sports Videos Based on Feature Fusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Standard actions are crucial to sports training of athletes and daily exercise of ordinary people. There are two key issues in sports action recognition: the extraction of sports action features, and the classification of sports actions. The existing action recognition algorithms cannot work effectively on sports competitions, which feature high complexity, fine class granularity, and fast action speed. To solve the problem, this paper develops an image recognition method of standard actions in sports videos, which merges local and global features. Firstly, the authors combed through the functions and performance required for the recognition of standard actions of sports, and proposed an attention-based local feature extraction algorithm for the frames of sports match videos. Next, a sampling algorithm was developed based on time-space compression, and a standard sports action recognition algorithm was designed based on time-space feature fusion, with the aim to fuse the time-space features of the standard actions in sports match videos, and to overcome the underfitting problem of direct fusion of time-space features extracted by the attention mechanism. The workflow of these algorithms was explained in details. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of our approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".