Journal of Membrane and Separation Technology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Journal of Membranes and Separation Technology is a peer-reviewed journal covers all aspects of membrane and separation sciences and technology. The Journal of Membranes and Separation Technology publishes high quality, original articles, review articles, case reports, field studies, and short communications as well as other scientific and educational information. The Journal of Membranes and Separation Technology facilitates the distribution and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to synthesis and characterization of membrane and separation materials, filtration, fouling, module and operations, process design, processes simulation and applications with the ultimate aim of promoting the best practice. The Journal of Membranes and Separation Technology is addressed to both practicing professionals and researchers in the membranes and separation technology, professionals in academia, former researchers and PhD students and other specialists interested in the results of scientific research in separation sciences related to membranes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it